Can we count your visit?

Our analytics service records the pages you view, so we can see which ones are useful. It saves a random ID in your browser, and we never use it for advertising. Read our privacy policy.

Zachary Morris v. Solgaard Design, Inc.

Filed

Case details

Standards cited
WCAG 2.1

Summary

According to the complaint, Plaintiff Zachary Morris, a visually-impaired individual, is suing Solgaard Design, Inc. for failing to make its website, www.solgaard.co, accessible under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The complaint alleges that the website contains numerous barriers that prevent blind users from accessing its goods and services, including missing alt-text and broken links. Morris seeks a permanent injunction requiring the company to comply with accessibility standards and to implement changes to ensure equal access for visually-impaired consumers. He also requests damages and legal fees.

About the defendant

Retailer specializing in sustainable travel products, including luggage, backpacks, briefcases, and accessories, made from recycled and ocean-bound plastics.

What the complaint says

The problems the plaintiff describes with the website.

  • Defendant's website is not accessible to blind and visually impaired individuals.
  • Plaintiff encountered barriers that denied him full access to the website.
  • Defendant failed to comply with WCAG 2.1 guidelines.

Legal claims

The laws the plaintiff says the defendant broke, called causes of action.

  • Violations of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12182 et seq.
  • Declaratory Relief

What the plaintiff asks for

What the plaintiff wants the court to order.

  • Preliminary and permanent injunction to prohibit Defendant from violating the ADA.
  • Injunction requiring Defendant to make its website fully compliant with the ADA.
  • Declaration that Defendant’s website discriminates against the blind.
  • Order certifying the Class and appointing Plaintiff as Class Representative.
  • Payment of nominal damages.
  • Pre- and post-judgment interest.
  • Award of costs and expenses of this action together with reasonable attorneys’ and expert fees.

Proposed class

The group of people the plaintiff asks to represent, so the case can cover them too.

All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Defendant’s Website and as a result have been denied access to the equal enjoyment of goods and services, during the relevant statutory period.