Can we count your visit?

Our analytics service records the pages you view, so we can see which ones are useful. It saves a random ID in your browser, and we never use it for advertising. Read our privacy policy.

Washington Moran v. Campanelli Products, LLC

Filed

Case details

Summary

According to the complaint, Plaintiff WASHINGTON MORAN, a visually-impaired individual, is suing CAMPANELLI PRODUCTS, LLC for failing to make its website, https://www.campanelli.shop/, accessible to blind users. The complaint alleges that the website contains multiple barriers that prevent blind individuals from accessing its goods and services, violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and other state laws. Key issues include the lack of alternative text for images, broken links, and inadequate navigation for screen-reader users. Plaintiffs seek a permanent injunction to require the defendant to make the website accessible and to provide compensatory damages for the alleged discrimination.

About the defendant

Operates an online retail store offering cleaning products and other goods, including information about pricing, terms of service, and policies.

What the complaint says

The problems the plaintiff describes with the website.

  • Defendant's website is not accessible to blind and visually-impaired individuals.
  • Plaintiff encountered multiple access barriers on the website.
  • Defendant has failed to comply with the ADA and other relevant laws.

Legal claims

The laws the plaintiff says the defendant broke, called causes of action.

  • Violations of the ADA
  • Violations of the NYSHRL
  • Violations of the NYCHRL
  • Violation of GBL § 349

What the plaintiff asks for

What the plaintiff wants the court to order.

  • Permanent injunction requiring Defendant to make its website accessible.
  • Compensatory damages for violations of civil rights.
  • Attorney’s fees and costs.

Proposed class

The group of people the plaintiff asks to represent, so the case can cover them too.

All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Defendant’s Website and as a result have been denied access to the equal enjoyment of goods and services offered by Defendant’s Website, during the relevant statutory period.