Can we count your visit?

Our analytics service records the pages you view, so we can see which ones are useful. It saves a random ID in your browser, and we never use it for advertising. Read our privacy policy.

Washington Moran v. Anastasia Beverly Hills, LLC

Filed

Case details

Summary

According to the complaint, Plaintiff WASHINGTON MORAN, a visually-impaired individual, is suing ANASTASIA BEVERLY HILLS, LLC for failing to make its website accessible as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The website, https://www.anastasiabeverlyhills.com/, allegedly contains multiple barriers that prevent blind users from accessing its content and services, including lack of alternative text for images and broken links. Plaintiffs allege that these barriers deny them equal access to the goods and services offered online. They seek a permanent injunction to require the defendant to make the website accessible and claim damages for the discrimination faced. The case is filed in the Southern District of New York.

About the defendant

Operates an online retail store offering cosmetics and beauty products, including information about pricing, terms of service, and promotions.

What the complaint says

The problems the plaintiff describes with the website.

  • Defendant's website is not accessible to blind and visually-impaired individuals.
  • Plaintiff encountered multiple access barriers on the website.
  • Defendant has failed to comply with the ADA and other relevant laws.

Legal claims

The laws the plaintiff says the defendant broke, called causes of action.

  • Violations of the ADA
  • Violations of the NYSHRL
  • Violations of the NYCHRL
  • Violation of GBL § 349

What the plaintiff asks for

What the plaintiff wants the court to order.

  • Permanent injunction requiring Defendant to make its website accessible to blind individuals.
  • Compensatory damages for violations of civil rights under various laws.
  • Attorney’s fees and costs.

Proposed class

The group of people the plaintiff asks to represent, so the case can cover them too.

All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Defendant’s Website and as a result have been denied access to the equal enjoyment of goods and services offered by Defendant’s Website, during the relevant statutory period.