Can we count your visit?

Our analytics service records the pages you view, so we can see which ones are useful. It saves a random ID in your browser, and we never use it for advertising. Read our privacy policy.

Washington Benavides Moran v. Value Max Products, LLC

Filed

Case details

Standards cited
WCAG 2.0

Summary

According to the complaint, plaintiff Washington Benavides Moran, a visually-impaired individual, is suing Value Max Products, LLC for failing to make its website, www.naturesbeeslipbalm.com, accessible to blind users. The plaintiff alleges that the website contains numerous barriers that prevent him from accessing information about products, including lip balms, and completing purchases. The complaint cites violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), New York State Human Rights Law, and other laws. The plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to require the defendant to make the website accessible and claims damages for the discrimination faced due to the website's inaccessibility.

About the defendant

Operates an online retail store selling lip balms and related products.

What the complaint says

The problems the plaintiff describes with the website.

  • Defendant's website is not accessible to blind and visually-impaired individuals.
  • Plaintiff encountered multiple access barriers preventing full use of the website.
  • Defendant has failed to comply with WCAG 2.0 guidelines.

Legal claims

The laws the plaintiff says the defendant broke, called causes of action.

  • Violations of the ADA
  • Violations of the NYSHRL
  • Violations of the NYCHRL
  • Violation of GBL § 349

What the plaintiff asks for

What the plaintiff wants the court to order.

  • Permanent injunction requiring Defendant to make its Website accessible to individuals with disabilities.
  • Compensatory damages for violations of civil rights under New York State Human Rights Law and GBL § 349.
  • Reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs.

Proposed class

The group of people the plaintiff asks to represent, so the case can cover them too.

All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Defendant’s Website and as a result have been denied access to the equal enjoyment of goods and services offered by Defendant’s Website, during the relevant statutory period.