Can we count your visit?

Our analytics service records the pages you view, so we can see which ones are useful. It saves a random ID in your browser, and we never use it for advertising. Read our privacy policy.

Washington Benavides Moran v. Munchkin, Inc.

Filed

Case details

Standards cited
WCAG 2.0

Summary

According to the complaint, Washington Benavides Moran, a visually-impaired individual, is suing Munchkin, Inc. for failing to make its website, www.munchkin.com, accessible to blind users. The plaintiff alleges that the website contains numerous barriers that prevent him from accessing information about infant products, including formula, and completing purchases. The complaint cites violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), New York State Human Rights Law, and other laws. The plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to require Munchkin to improve website accessibility and compensatory damages for the discrimination faced.

About the defendant

Operates an online retail store offering infant and toddler products, including formula, along with information about pricing, terms of service, and policies.

What the complaint says

The problems the plaintiff describes with the website.

  • Defendant's website is not accessible to blind and visually-impaired persons.
  • Plaintiff encountered multiple access barriers preventing full use of the website.
  • Defendant failed to comply with WCAG 2.0 guidelines.

Legal claims

The laws the plaintiff says the defendant broke, called causes of action.

  • Violations of the ADA
  • Violations of the NYSHRL
  • Violations of the NYCHRL
  • Violation of GBL § 349

What the plaintiff asks for

What the plaintiff wants the court to order.

  • Permanent injunction requiring Defendant to make its Website accessible to blind individuals.
  • Compensatory damages for violations of civil rights under New York State Human Rights Law and GBL § 349.
  • Reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs.

Proposed class

The group of people the plaintiff asks to represent, so the case can cover them too.

All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Defendant’s Website and as a result have been denied access to the equal enjoyment of goods and services offered by Defendant’s Website, during the relevant statutory period.