Can we count your visit?

Our analytics service records the pages you view, so we can see which ones are useful. It saves a random ID in your browser, and we never use it for advertising. Read our privacy policy.

Victor Lopez v. Furnitureland South, Inc.

Filed

Case details

Standards cited
WCAG 2.0

Summary

According to the complaint, Victor Lopez, a visually-impaired individual, is suing Furnitureland South, Inc. for failing to make its website accessible as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The complaint alleges that the website contains numerous barriers that prevent blind users from accessing information about products and services, including lack of alternative text for images and broken links. Lopez seeks a permanent injunction to require the defendant to improve website accessibility and claims damages for the discrimination faced. The case also includes class action allegations on behalf of all legally blind individuals who have faced similar issues with the website.

About the defendant

Operates an online retail store offering furniture and home décor products, including information about pricing, terms of service, and policies.

What the complaint says

The problems the plaintiff describes with the website.

  • Defendant's website is not accessible to blind and visually-impaired persons.
  • Plaintiff encountered multiple access barriers preventing full use of the website.
  • Defendant failed to provide necessary modifications to ensure accessibility.

Legal claims

The laws the plaintiff says the defendant broke, called causes of action.

  • Violations of the ADA
  • Violations of the NYSHRL
  • Violations of the NYCHRL
  • Violation of GBL § 349

What the plaintiff asks for

What the plaintiff wants the court to order.

  • Permanent injunction requiring Defendant to make its Website accessible to blind individuals.
  • Compensatory damages for violations of civil rights under applicable laws.
  • Reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs.

Proposed class

The group of people the plaintiff asks to represent, so the case can cover them too.

All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Defendant’s Website and as a result have been denied access to the equal enjoyment of goods and services offered by Defendant’s Website, during the relevant statutory period.