Can we count your visit?

Our analytics service records the pages you view, so we can see which ones are useful. It saves a random ID in your browser, and we never use it for advertising. Read our privacy policy.

Tanisia Bowman v. Luxury Time Pieces by Razny Jewelers, LLC

Filed

Case details

Defendant’s website
Standards cited
WCAG 2.2

Summary

According to the complaint, TANISIA BOWMAN, a visually impaired individual, is suing Luxury Time Pieces by Razny Jewelers, LLC for failing to make their website, https://razny.com, accessible to blind and visually impaired users. The plaintiff alleges that the website contains significant access barriers that prevent her from completing transactions independently, violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). BOWMAN claims that the website's design lacks necessary features for screen-reader compatibility, making it impossible for her and others like her to navigate and purchase products. She seeks a permanent injunction to require the defendant to make the website accessible and compensatory damages for the discrimination faced by her and the class members.

About the defendant

Provides a wide array of jewelry and accessories, including engagement rings, diamond earrings, watches, bracelets, necklaces, and custom-designed jewelry for online purchase.

What the complaint says

The problems the plaintiff describes with the website.

  • Website is inaccessible to visually impaired individuals
  • Failure to provide necessary accommodations for screen-reader users
  • Denial of equal access to goods and services offered online

Legal claims

The laws the plaintiff says the defendant broke, called causes of action.

  • Violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
  • Declaratory Relief

What the plaintiff asks for

What the plaintiff wants the court to order.

  • Permanent injunction to make the Website accessible
  • Compensatory damages for Class Members
  • Certification of the case as a class action

Proposed class

The group of people the plaintiff asks to represent, so the case can cover them too.

All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access the Website and as a result have been denied access to the enjoyment of goods and services offered by the Website, during the relevant statutory period.