Can we count your visit?

Our analytics service records the pages you view, so we can see which ones are useful. It saves a random ID in your browser, and we never use it for advertising. Read our privacy policy.

Sumaya Hussein v. Glam And Glits Nail Design, Inc.

Filed

Case details

Standards cited
WCAG 2.2

Summary

According to the complaint, plaintiff Sumaya Hussein, a visually impaired individual, is suing Glam And Glits Nail Design, Inc. for failing to make its website, kiarasky.com, accessible to blind users. Hussein alleges that the website contains significant barriers that prevent her and others from independently navigating and completing purchases. The complaint cites violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and seeks a permanent injunction to require the defendant to make the website accessible, as well as compensatory damages for affected individuals.

About the defendant

Provides consumers access to an array of goods and services, including the ability to purchase a wide range of professional nail products, including gel polishes, nail tools and accessories, nail art supplies, kits and bundles.

What the complaint says

The problems the plaintiff describes with the website.

  • Defendant's website is inaccessible to visually impaired individuals.
  • Access barriers prevent blind users from completing transactions on the website.
  • Defendant failed to implement necessary modifications for accessibility.

Legal claims

The laws the plaintiff says the defendant broke, called causes of action.

  • Violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
  • Declaratory Relief

What the plaintiff asks for

What the plaintiff wants the court to order.

  • Permanent injunction to make the website accessible.
  • Compensatory damages for Class Members.
  • Certification of the case as a class action.

Proposed class

The group of people the plaintiff asks to represent, so the case can cover them too.

All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access the Website and as a result have been denied access to the enjoyment of goods and services offered by the Website, during the relevant statutory period.