Sophia Faldonie v. Birdies Hot Chicken Inc
Filed
Case details
- Defendant’s website
Summary
According to the complaint, Sophia Faldonie, a legally blind individual, is suing Birdies Hot Chicken Inc for failing to make its website accessible to blind users, violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Faldonie alleges that she encountered numerous barriers while attempting to navigate the website, including improper heading hierarchy and ambiguous link texts. She seeks a permanent injunction requiring the defendant to improve website accessibility and ensure compliance with ADA standards. The complaint highlights the importance of digital accessibility for individuals with visual disabilities and the need for businesses to adopt inclusive practices.
About the defendant
Specializes in Nashville-style hot chicken dishes and other restaurant services.
What the complaint says
The problems the plaintiff describes with the website.
- Defendant's website is not accessible to blind individuals
- Plaintiff encountered multiple access barriers while using the website
- Defendant has failed to implement necessary changes for accessibility
Legal claims
The laws the plaintiff says the defendant broke, called causes of action.
- Violation of 42 U.S.C. §§ 12181, et seq., Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act
- Declaratory Relief
What the plaintiff asks for
What the plaintiff wants the court to order.
- Preliminary and permanent injunction to prohibit Defendant from violating the ADA
- Injunction requiring Defendant to make the Website compliant with the ADA
- Declaration that Defendant discriminates against the blind
- Plaintiff’s reasonable attorneys' fees and costs
- Pre- and post-judgment interest