Can we count your visit?

Our analytics service records the pages you view, so we can see which ones are useful. It saves a random ID in your browser, and we never use it for advertising. Read our privacy policy.

Castro v. Petit Trois Le Valley, L.P.

Filed

Case details

Summary

On June 29, 2020, SHEILA BIGLANG-AWA CASTRO filed a Complaint in California Federal court against PETIT TROIS LE VALLEY, L.P.. Plaintiff SHEILA BIGLANG-AWA CASTRO alleges that www.petittrois.com is not accessible per the WCAG 2.0, Section 508 accessibility standard(s).

About the defendant

Petit Trois is a pair of French restaurants in the Los Angeles area.

What the complaint says

The problems the plaintiff describes with the website.

  • The home page has graphics, links, and buttons that are not labeled or are incorrectly labeled, or lack alternative text (“Alt-text”).
  • There are multiple unlabeled or mislabeled buttons and links.
  • Plaintiff encountered multiple pages containing insufficient navigational headings requiring Plaintiff to expend substantial additional time to access information;
  • Plaintiff was unable to browse product because product links and descriptions were inaccessible to screen reading technology; and
  • Plaintiff was unable to make a purchase because of an inaccessible checkout system.

Legal claims

The laws the plaintiff says the defendant broke, called causes of action.

  • Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12181 et seq.
  • Unruh Civil Rights Act, California Civil Code § 51 et seq.

What the plaintiff asks for

What the plaintiff wants the court to order.

  • A Declaratory Judgment that at the commencement of this action Defendant was in violation of the specific requirements of Title III of the ADA 42 U.S.C. § 12181 et seq., and the relevant implementing regulations of the ADA, for Defendant’s failure to take action that was reasonably calculated to ensure that its Website is fully accessible to, and independently usable by, blind and visuallyimpaired individuals;
  • A preliminary and permanent injunction enjoining Defendant from violating the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12181 et seq., and/or the UCRA, Civil Code § 51 et seq. with respect to its website petittrois.com;
  • A preliminary and permanent injunction requiring Defendant to take the steps necessary to make Atriumtopanga.com readily accessible to and usable by blind and visually-impaired individuals;
  • An award of statutory minimum damages of $4,000 per violation pursuant to § 52(a) of the California Civil Code;
  • For attorneys' fees and expenses pursuant to all applicable laws including, without limitation, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 12188(a)(1), and California Civil Code § 52(a);
  • For pre-judgment interest to the extent permitted by law;
  • For costs of suit; and
  • For such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.