Can we count your visit?

Our analytics service records the pages you view, so we can see which ones are useful. It saves a random ID in your browser, and we never use it for advertising. Read our privacy policy.

Rosemarie Ramirez v. Wood Trick, LLC

Filed

Case details

Standards cited
WCAG 2.1

Summary

According to the complaint, Plaintiff ROSEMARIE RAMIREZ, a visually-impaired individual, alleges that WOOD TRICK, LLC's website, www.woodtrick.com, is inaccessible to blind users, violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Plaintiff claims that she encountered numerous barriers while attempting to purchase a wooden 3D puzzle kit, including missing alt-text and broken links, which prevented her from accessing the website's goods and services. The complaint seeks a permanent injunction requiring the defendant to make its website compliant with accessibility standards and to implement policies ensuring ongoing accessibility for visually-impaired users.

About the defendant

Offers a variety of wooden 3D mechanical model kits and puzzles designed for consumer assembly and purchase through its online store.

What the complaint says

The problems the plaintiff describes with the website.

  • Defendant’s website is not accessible to blind and visually impaired individuals.
  • Plaintiff encountered barriers that denied her full and equal access to the website.
  • Defendant failed to comply with WCAG 2.1 guidelines.

Legal claims

The laws the plaintiff says the defendant broke, called causes of action.

  • Violations of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12182 et seq.
  • Declaratory Relief

What the plaintiff asks for

What the plaintiff wants the court to order.

  • Preliminary and permanent injunction to prohibit Defendant from violating the ADA.
  • Injunction requiring Defendant to make its website fully compliant with the ADA.
  • Declaration that Defendant’s website discriminates against the blind.
  • Order certifying the Class and appointing Plaintiff as Class Representative.
  • Payment of nominal damages.
  • Pre- and post-judgment interest.
  • Award of costs and expenses of this action together with reasonable attorneys’ and expert fees.

Proposed class

The group of people the plaintiff asks to represent, so the case can cover them too.

All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Defendant’s Website and as a result have been denied access to the equal enjoyment of goods and services, during the relevant statutory period.