Can we count your visit?

Our analytics service records the pages you view, so we can see which ones are useful. It saves a random ID in your browser, and we never use it for advertising. Read our privacy policy.

Nick Gawronski v. Suno Inc.

Filed

Case details

Defendant’s website
Standards cited
4.1.3

Summary

According to the complaint, plaintiff Nick Gawronski alleges that Suno Inc. operates an inaccessible artificial intelligence music generation platform at suno.com, which discriminates against blind users by failing to provide necessary accessibility features. Gawronski claims that he has faced significant barriers while using the platform, including unlabeled buttons and a lack of feedback from the interface, which violates the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Texas Human Resources Code. He seeks declaratory and injunctive relief to address these issues, as well as damages for the loss of his original audio tracks and attorneys' fees.

About the defendant

Operates an artificial intelligence music generation network offering subscription-based digital music generation services.

What the complaint says

The problems the plaintiff describes with the website.

  • Defendant maintains a highly inaccessible user interface for blind individuals.
  • Defendant's platform fails to provide necessary accessibility features for screen reader users.
  • Plaintiff has experienced severe accessibility barriers while using the platform.

Legal claims

The laws the plaintiff says the defendant broke, called causes of action.

  • Violation of ADA Title III
  • Violation of the Texas Human Resources Code

What the plaintiff asks for

What the plaintiff wants the court to order.

  • Declaratory judgment of violations of the ADA and Texas Human Resources Code.
  • Preliminary and permanent injunctive relief to remediate accessibility issues.
  • Statutory damages for civil liberties deprivation.
  • Actual damages for loss of original audio tracks.
  • Reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses.
  • Costs of suit.