Mykayla Fagnani v. American Outdoor Products, Inc.
Filed
Case details
- Defendant’s website
- Standards cited
- WCAG 2.0
Summary
According to the complaint, Mykayla Fagnani, a visually-impaired individual, is suing American Outdoor Products, Inc. for failing to make its website, www.astronautfoods.com, accessible to blind users. The plaintiff alleges that the website contains multiple barriers that prevent her from accessing information about products, including freeze-dried astronaut food, and completing purchases. The complaint cites violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and seeks a permanent injunction to require the defendant to make necessary changes to its website to ensure accessibility. The plaintiff also seeks compensatory damages and attorneys' fees for the alleged discrimination.
About the defendant
Operates an online retail store selling freeze-dried astronaut food and related products, providing information about goods, pricing, terms of service, and policies.
What the complaint says
The problems the plaintiff describes with the website.
- Defendant's website is not accessible to blind and visually-impaired individuals.
- Plaintiff encountered multiple access barriers while attempting to use the website.
- Defendant has failed to comply with the ADA and other relevant laws regarding website accessibility.
Legal claims
The laws the plaintiff says the defendant broke, called causes of action.
- Violations of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12181 et seq.
- Violations of the NYSHRL
- Violations of the NYCHRL
- Violation of GBL § 349
What the plaintiff asks for
What the plaintiff wants the court to order.
- A permanent injunction requiring Defendant to make its Website accessible to blind individuals.
- Compensatory damages for violations of civil rights under New York State Human Rights Law and GBL § 349.
- Reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs.
Proposed class
The group of people the plaintiff asks to represent, so the case can cover them too.
All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Defendant’s Website and as a result have been denied access to the equal enjoyment of goods and services offered by Defendant’s Website, during the relevant statutory period.