Can we count your visit?

Our analytics service records the pages you view, so we can see which ones are useful. It saves a random ID in your browser, and we never use it for advertising. Read our privacy policy.

Mary Ann Deinnocentes v. Enstep Technology, LLC

Filed

Case details

Standards cited
WCAG 2.2

Summary

According to the complaint, Mary Ann Deinnocentes, a visually impaired individual, is suing Enstep Technology, LLC for failing to make its website, Crazycompression.com, accessible under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Deinnocentes alleges that the website contains significant barriers that prevent blind and visually impaired users from independently navigating and completing transactions. The complaint cites various accessibility issues, including lack of alternative text for images and reliance on mouse navigation. Deinnocentes seeks a permanent injunction to require the defendant to make the website accessible and compensatory damages for the discrimination experienced. The case is filed as a class action on behalf of all legally blind individuals who have faced similar barriers.

About the defendant

provides consumers access to an array of goods and services, including the ability to purchase a wide selection of compression wear and related products, including compression socks and calf compression sleeves

What the complaint says

The problems the plaintiff describes with the website.

  • Website is inaccessible to visually impaired individuals
  • Access barriers prevent independent navigation and transactions
  • Defendant failed to implement necessary accessibility features

Legal claims

The laws the plaintiff says the defendant broke, called causes of action.

  • Violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
  • Declaratory Relief

What the plaintiff asks for

What the plaintiff wants the court to order.

  • preliminary and permanent injunction to prohibit Defendant from violating the ADA
  • injunction requiring Defendant to make the Website compliant with the ADA
  • declaration that Defendant discriminates against the visually impaired
  • class action certification
  • pre- and post-judgment interest
  • award of costs and expenses
  • further relief as deemed just and proper

Proposed class

The group of people the plaintiff asks to represent, so the case can cover them too.

all legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access the Website and as a result have been denied access to the enjoyment of goods and services offered by the Website, during the relevant statutory period