Tatum-rios v. Stylogic Ltd.

Summary

On October 10, 2019, Lynette Tatum-Rios filed a Complaint in New York Federal court against Stylogic Ltd.. Plaintiff Lynette Tatum-Rios alleges that www.stylogic.co is not accessible per the WCAG 2.0 accessibility standard(s).

About the defendant

Stylogic is a subscription styling service that sends clothing and accessory items every month.

What the complaint says

The problems the plaintiff describes with the website.

• Lack of alt-text for images
• Fieldset elements are not labeled with legend elements
• Documents do not have a title
• Frames do not have a title
• Some pages have the same title so the title cannot be used to distinguish pages
• Button elements are empty
• Forms have fields without label elements or title attributes
• Webpages have duplicate IDs which cause problems in screen readers
• Radio button groups are not contained in a fieldset element
• Form field labels are not unique on a page or enclosed in a fieldset with a legend that makes the label unique
• Headings are not nested correctly and approximately five (5) headings are empty
• Links use general text like “read more” which doesn’t explain the link purpose
• Several links on a page share the same link text but go to different destinations
• Webpages have markup errors

Legal claims

The laws the plaintiff says the defendant broke, called causes of action.

• Violations of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12181 et seq.
• Violations of the NYSHRL
• Violations of the NYCHRL
• Declaratory Relief

What the plaintiff asks for

What the plaintiff wants the court to order.

• A preliminary and permanent injunction to prohibit Defendant from violating Title III of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12182, et seq., N.Y. Exec. Law § 296, et seq., N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-107, et seq., and the laws of New York
• A preliminary and permanent injunction requiring Defendant to take all the steps necessary to make its Website into full compliance with the requirements set forth in Title III of the ADA, and its implementing regulations, so that the Website is readily accessible to and usable by blind individuals
• A declaration that Defendant owns, maintains and/or operates the Website in a manner that discriminates against the blind and which fails to provide access for persons with disabilities as required by ADA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12182, et seq., N.Y. Exec. Law § 296, et seq., N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-107, et seq., and the laws of New York
• An order certifying the Class and Subclasses under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a) & (b)(2) and/or (b)(3), appointing Plaintiff as Class Representative, and his attorneys as Class Counsel
• Compensatory damages in an amount to be determined by proof, including all applicable statutory damages, punitive damages and fines
• Pre- and post-judgment interest
• An award of costs and expenses of this action together with reasonable attorneys’ and expert fees
• Such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper