Can we count your visit?

Our analytics service records the pages you view, so we can see which ones are useful. It saves a random ID in your browser, and we never use it for advertising. Read our privacy policy.

Leshawn Young v. DG Buyer, LLC

Filed

Case details

Standards cited
WCAG 2.0

Summary

According to the complaint, Leshawn Young, a visually-impaired individual, is suing DG Buyer, LLC for failing to make its website, www.drcomfort.com, accessible to blind users. The plaintiff alleges that the website contains numerous barriers that prevent her from accessing products and services, violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and related New York laws. Young seeks a permanent injunction to require the defendant to improve website accessibility and compensatory damages for the discrimination faced. The complaint highlights specific access issues, including lack of alternative text for images and broken links, which hinder the ability of visually-impaired users to navigate the site effectively.

About the defendant

Operates an online retail store offering diabetic and therapeutic footwear, orthotics, and compression hosiery.

What the complaint says

The problems the plaintiff describes with the website.

  • Defendant's website is not accessible to blind and visually-impaired persons.
  • Plaintiff encountered multiple access barriers preventing full use of the website.
  • Defendant failed to comply with WCAG 2.0 guidelines.

Legal claims

The laws the plaintiff says the defendant broke, called causes of action.

  • Violations of the ADA
  • Violations of the NYSHRL
  • Violations of the NYCHRL
  • Violation of GBL § 349

What the plaintiff asks for

What the plaintiff wants the court to order.

  • Permanent injunction requiring Defendant to make its Website accessible to blind individuals.
  • Compensatory damages for violations of civil rights under New York State Human Rights Law and GBL § 349.
  • Reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs.

Proposed class

The group of people the plaintiff asks to represent, so the case can cover them too.

All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Defendant’s Website and as a result have been denied access to the equal enjoyment of goods and services offered by Defendant’s Website, during the relevant statutory period.