Can we count your visit?

Our analytics service records the pages you view, so we can see which ones are useful. It saves a random ID in your browser, and we never use it for advertising. Read our privacy policy.

Laurence Wills v. Tesolife US, Inc.

Filed

Case details

Summary

According to the complaint, Laurence Wills, a visually impaired individual, is suing Tesolife US, Inc. for failing to make its website, www.tesolife.com, accessible to blind users. Wills alleges that he encountered numerous barriers while attempting to access the website, which prevented him from purchasing original Chinese products. The complaint cites violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and New York City Human Rights Law (NYCHRL), claiming that the website's design does not comply with accessibility standards. Wills seeks a permanent injunction to require the defendant to make the website accessible and to provide compensatory damages for the alleged discrimination.

About the defendant

Offers a wide selection of genuine Chinese items, including traditional handicrafts and modern electronics, focusing on authenticity and direct partnerships with trusted Chinese manufacturers.

What the complaint says

The problems the plaintiff describes with the website.

  • Defendant’s website is not accessible to blind and visually impaired individuals.
  • Plaintiff was denied full and equal access to the website due to its design.
  • Defendant failed to comply with WCAG 2.1 guidelines.

Legal claims

The laws the plaintiff says the defendant broke, called causes of action.

  • Violations of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12182 et seq.
  • Violations of the NYCHRL
  • Declaratory Relief

What the plaintiff asks for

What the plaintiff wants the court to order.

  • Permanent injunction requiring Defendant to make its Website accessible to blind individuals.
  • Compensatory damages for violations of civil rights under New York City Human Rights Law.
  • Certification of the Class and Sub-Classes.

Proposed class

The group of people the plaintiff asks to represent, so the case can cover them too.

All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Defendant’s Website and as a result have been denied access to the equal enjoyment of goods and services, during the relevant statutory period.