Can we count your visit?

Our analytics service records the pages you view, so we can see which ones are useful. It saves a random ID in your browser, and we never use it for advertising. Read our privacy policy.

Kevin Orcel v. Satya Beverages, LLC

Filed

Case details

Standards cited
WCAG 2.1

Summary

According to the complaint, Kevin Orcel, a visually-impaired individual, is suing Satya Beverages, LLC for failing to make its website, www.meximodo.com, accessible to blind users as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Orcel alleges that he encountered multiple barriers while attempting to access the website to make a reservation at the restaurant, which prevented him from enjoying the same experience as sighted individuals. The complaint cites specific access issues, including missing alt-text and unclear labels for interactive elements. Orcel seeks a permanent injunction requiring the defendant to comply with accessibility standards and to ensure that the website is usable by blind individuals. He also requests damages and costs associated with the lawsuit.

About the defendant

A restaurant specializing in Mexican cuisine, offering a range of entrees, appetizers, and specialty dishes with a full-service dining experience.

What the complaint says

The problems the plaintiff describes with the website.

  • Defendant's website is not accessible to blind and visually impaired individuals.
  • Plaintiff was denied the ability to make a reservation due to website barriers.
  • Defendant has failed to comply with WCAG 2.1 guidelines.

Legal claims

The laws the plaintiff says the defendant broke, called causes of action.

  • Violations of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12182 et seq.
  • Declaratory Relief

What the plaintiff asks for

What the plaintiff wants the court to order.

  • A preliminary and permanent injunction to prohibit Defendant from violating the ADA.
  • An order requiring Defendant to make its website fully compliant with the ADA.
  • A declaration that Defendant’s website discriminates against the blind.
  • Payment of nominal damages.
  • An award of costs and expenses of this action.

Proposed class

The group of people the plaintiff asks to represent, so the case can cover them too.

All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Defendant’s Website and as a result have been denied access to the equal enjoyment of goods and services, during the relevant statutory period.