Can we count your visit?

Our analytics service records the pages you view, so we can see which ones are useful. It saves a random ID in your browser, and we never use it for advertising. Read our privacy policy.

Kevin Orcel v. Restaurant Investment Group, LLC

Filed

Case details

Standards cited
WCAG 2.1

Summary

According to the complaint, Kevin Orcel, a visually-impaired individual, is suing Restaurant Investment Group, LLC for failing to make its website, www.eatphotoday.com, accessible under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The plaintiff alleges that he encountered numerous barriers while attempting to place an online order for Vietnamese food, which prevented him from accessing the website's services. The complaint cites specific access issues such as missing alt-text and unclear labels for interactive elements. Orcel seeks a permanent injunction requiring the defendant to comply with accessibility standards and to ensure that the website is usable by blind individuals. He also requests damages and legal fees.

About the defendant

Offers Vietnamese cuisine with options for online ordering, delivery, and takeout.

What the complaint says

The problems the plaintiff describes with the website.

  • Defendant's website is not accessible to blind and visually impaired individuals.
  • Plaintiff was denied the ability to place an online order due to access barriers on the website.
  • Defendant has failed to comply with WCAG 2.1 guidelines.

Legal claims

The laws the plaintiff says the defendant broke, called causes of action.

  • Violations of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12182 et seq.
  • Declaratory Relief

What the plaintiff asks for

What the plaintiff wants the court to order.

  • A preliminary and permanent injunction to prohibit Defendant from violating the ADA.
  • An order requiring Defendant to make its website fully compliant with the ADA.
  • Payment of nominal damages.
  • An award of costs and expenses of this action together with reasonable attorneys’ and expert fees.

Proposed class

The group of people the plaintiff asks to represent, so the case can cover them too.

All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Defendant’s Website and as a result have been denied access to the equal enjoyment of goods and services, during the relevant statutory period.