Can we count your visit?

Our analytics service records the pages you view, so we can see which ones are useful. It saves a random ID in your browser, and we never use it for advertising. Read our privacy policy.

Kevin Orcel v. Raoul’s Restaurant Corporation

Filed

Case details

Standards cited
WCAG 2.1

Summary

According to the complaint, Kevin Orcel, a visually-impaired individual, is suing Raoul's Restaurant Corporation for failing to make its website, www.raouls.com, accessible under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Orcel alleges that he encountered multiple barriers while attempting to access the website to make a reservation, which prevented him from enjoying the same services as sighted individuals. The complaint cites specific access issues and claims that the website does not comply with WCAG 2.1 guidelines. Orcel seeks a permanent injunction to require the defendant to make the website accessible and to certify a class of similarly situated individuals.

About the defendant

A restaurant offering a curated selection of dishes, beverages, and dining services, including the ability to make reservations online.

What the complaint says

The problems the plaintiff describes with the website.

  • Defendant's website is not accessible to blind and visually impaired individuals.
  • Plaintiff was denied the ability to make a reservation due to website barriers.
  • Defendant has failed to comply with WCAG 2.1 guidelines.

Legal claims

The laws the plaintiff says the defendant broke, called causes of action.

  • Violations of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12182 et seq.
  • Declaratory Relief

What the plaintiff asks for

What the plaintiff wants the court to order.

  • A preliminary and permanent injunction to prohibit Defendant from violating the ADA.
  • An order requiring Defendant to make its website fully compliant with the ADA.
  • A declaration that Defendant’s website discriminates against the blind.
  • Certification of the Class under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23.
  • Payment of nominal damages.
  • Pre- and post-judgment interest.
  • An award of costs and expenses of this action together with reasonable attorneys’ and expert fees.

Proposed class

The group of people the plaintiff asks to represent, so the case can cover them too.

All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Defendant’s Website and as a result have been denied access to the equal enjoyment of goods and services, during the relevant statutory period.