Can we count your visit?

Our analytics service records the pages you view, so we can see which ones are useful. It saves a random ID in your browser, and we never use it for advertising. Read our privacy policy.

Kevin Orcel v. Nova Dental Associates, PC

Filed

Case details

Standards cited
WCAG 2.1

Summary

According to the complaint, Kevin Orcel, a visually impaired individual, is suing Nova Dental Associates, PC for failing to make its website, www.novadentalnj.com, accessible to blind users. The plaintiff alleges that he encountered numerous barriers while attempting to book a dental appointment, which violated his rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The complaint cites specific access issues such as missing alt-text and unclear labels that hinder the use of screen-reading software. Orcel seeks a permanent injunction to require the defendant to comply with accessibility standards and to ensure equal access for visually impaired consumers.

About the defendant

Provides dental services including preventive care, cleanings, cosmetic dentistry, orthodontics, and restorative treatments.

What the complaint says

The problems the plaintiff describes with the website.

  • Defendant's website is not accessible to blind and visually impaired individuals.
  • Plaintiff was denied the ability to book a dental appointment due to website barriers.
  • Defendant has failed to comply with WCAG 2.1 guidelines.

Legal claims

The laws the plaintiff says the defendant broke, called causes of action.

  • Violations of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12182 et seq.
  • Declaratory Relief

What the plaintiff asks for

What the plaintiff wants the court to order.

  • A preliminary and permanent injunction to prohibit Defendant from violating the ADA.
  • An order requiring Defendant to make its website fully compliant with the ADA.
  • A declaration that Defendant’s website discriminates against the blind.

Proposed class

The group of people the plaintiff asks to represent, so the case can cover them too.

All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Defendant’s Website and as a result have been denied access to the equal enjoyment of goods and services, during the relevant statutory period.