Can we count your visit?

Our analytics service records the pages you view, so we can see which ones are useful. It saves a random ID in your browser, and we never use it for advertising. Read our privacy policy.

Kevin Orcel v. Haven Riverfront Restaurant and Bar, LLC

Filed

Case details

Standards cited
WCAG 2.1

Summary

According to the complaint, Kevin Orcel, a visually-impaired individual, is suing Haven Riverfront Restaurant and Bar, LLC for failing to make its website, www.havenedgewater.com, accessible under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The plaintiff alleges that he encountered numerous barriers while attempting to use the website to make a reservation, including missing alt-text and unclear labels for interactive elements. He claims these barriers denied him full and equal access to the restaurant's services. The plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction requiring the defendant to comply with accessibility standards and to implement changes to ensure the website is usable by blind individuals. The case is filed as a class action on behalf of all legally blind individuals who have faced similar issues.

About the defendant

A restaurant offering a contemporary American menu, curated cocktails, and a full-service dining operation supported by a dedicated culinary team.

What the complaint says

The problems the plaintiff describes with the website.

  • Defendant's website is not accessible to blind and visually impaired individuals.
  • Plaintiff was denied the ability to make a reservation due to website barriers.
  • Defendant has failed to comply with WCAG 2.1 guidelines.

Legal claims

The laws the plaintiff says the defendant broke, called causes of action.

  • Violations of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12182 et seq.
  • Declaratory Relief

What the plaintiff asks for

What the plaintiff wants the court to order.

  • A preliminary and permanent injunction to prohibit Defendant from violating the ADA.
  • An order requiring Defendant to make its website fully compliant with the ADA.
  • Payment of nominal damages.
  • An award of costs and expenses of this action together with reasonable attorneys’ and expert fees.

Proposed class

The group of people the plaintiff asks to represent, so the case can cover them too.

All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Defendant’s Website and as a result have been denied access to the equal enjoyment of goods and services, during the relevant statutory period.