Can we count your visit?

Our analytics service records the pages you view, so we can see which ones are useful. It saves a random ID in your browser, and we never use it for advertising. Read our privacy policy.

Judith Adela Fernandez Martinez v. PURELY ELIZABETH LLC

Filed

Case details

Summary

According to the complaint, Judith Adela Fernandez Martinez, a visually-impaired individual, is suing Purely Elizabeth LLC for failing to make its website accessible as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The website, https://purelyelizabeth.com/, allegedly contains multiple barriers that prevent blind users from accessing its content and services, including broken links and lack of alternative text for images. The plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to require the defendant to improve website accessibility and claims that the current state of the website violates her rights under the ADA and other New York laws. The complaint also seeks compensatory damages and attorney's fees.

About the defendant

Operates an online retail store offering a variety of food products including granolas, oatmeals, and cereals.

What the complaint says

The problems the plaintiff describes with the website.

  • Defendant's website is not accessible to blind and visually-impaired individuals.
  • Plaintiff encountered multiple access barriers on the website.
  • Defendant has failed to comply with the ADA and other relevant laws.

Legal claims

The laws the plaintiff says the defendant broke, called causes of action.

  • Violations of the ADA
  • Violations of the NYSHRL
  • Violations of the NYCHRL
  • Violation of GBL § 349

What the plaintiff asks for

What the plaintiff wants the court to order.

  • Permanent injunction requiring Defendant to make its website accessible.
  • Compensatory damages for violations of civil rights.
  • Attorney’s fees and costs.

Proposed class

The group of people the plaintiff asks to represent, so the case can cover them too.

All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Defendant’s Website and as a result have been denied access to the equal enjoyment of goods and services offered by Defendant’s Website, during the relevant statutory period.