Jose Nonato v. Urevo Wellness US Co., LTD

Summary

According to the complaint, Jose Nonato, a visually impaired individual, is suing Urevo Wellness US Co., LTD for failing to make its website, https://www.urevo.com, accessible to blind users, violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Nonato alleges that the website contains significant access barriers that prevent him and others from independently navigating and completing transactions. He seeks a permanent injunction to require the defendant to make the website accessible and compensatory damages for the discrimination faced. The complaint highlights specific issues such as lack of alternative text for images and reliance on mouse navigation, which excludes visually impaired individuals from accessing the website's services.

About the defendant

Provides consumers access to an array of goods and services, including the ability to purchase a wide range of smart fitness equipment, including walking pads, recovery devices, mats, remotes, supporting tools, and other products for wellness and home exercise.

What the complaint says

The problems the plaintiff describes with the website.

• Website is inaccessible to visually impaired individuals
• Access barriers prevent blind users from completing transactions
• Defendant failed to provide necessary accommodations for screen-reader users

Legal claims

The laws the plaintiff says the defendant broke, called causes of action.

• Violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)

What the plaintiff asks for

What the plaintiff wants the court to order.

• Preliminary and permanent injunction to prohibit Defendant from violating the ADA
• Injunction requiring Defendant to make the Website compliant with the ADA
• Declaration that the Website discriminates against the visually impaired
• Class action certification
• Pre- and post-judgment interest
• Award of costs and expenses of this action together with reasonable attorneys’ and expert fees

Proposed class

The group of people the plaintiff asks to represent, so the case can cover them too.

all legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access the Website and as a result have been denied access to the enjoyment of goods and services offered by the Website, during the relevant statutory period.