Can we count your visit?

Our analytics service records the pages you view, so we can see which ones are useful. It saves a random ID in your browser, and we never use it for advertising. Read our privacy policy.

Howard Wilson v. Reversible, Inc.

Filed

Case details

Standards cited
WCAG 2.1

Summary

According to the complaint, Plaintiff Howard Wilson, a visually-impaired individual, is suing Reversible, Inc. for failing to make its website, www.reversible.com, accessible under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The complaint alleges that the website contains numerous barriers that prevent blind users from fully accessing its goods and services, including missing alt-text and broken links. Wilson seeks a permanent injunction requiring the defendant to comply with accessibility standards and to implement changes to ensure equal access for visually-impaired consumers. The case is filed as a class action on behalf of all legally blind individuals who have faced similar issues with the website.

About the defendant

An online retail platform offering a wide selection of apparel and accessories from established fashion brands, including outerwear, knitwear, footwear, and accessories.

What the complaint says

The problems the plaintiff describes with the website.

  • Defendant’s website is not equally accessible to blind and visually impaired consumers.
  • Plaintiff encountered barriers that denied his full and equal access to Defendant’s online goods, content and services.
  • Defendant failed to construct and maintain a website that is sufficiently intuitive for visually impaired individuals.

Legal claims

The laws the plaintiff says the defendant broke, called causes of action.

  • Violations of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12182 et seq.
  • Declaratory Relief

What the plaintiff asks for

What the plaintiff wants the court to order.

  • A preliminary and permanent injunction to prohibit Defendant from violating the Americans with Disabilities Act.
  • A preliminary and permanent injunction requiring Defendant to make its website fully compliant with the ADA.
  • A declaration that Defendant’s website discriminates against the blind and fails to provide access for persons with disabilities.
  • An order certifying the Class and appointing Plaintiff as Class Representative.

Proposed class

The group of people the plaintiff asks to represent, so the case can cover them too.

All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Defendant’s Website and as a result have been denied access to the equal enjoyment of goods and services, during the relevant statutory period.