Geovanni Bahena Figueroa v. Akwhp, LLC
Filed
Case details
- Defendant’s website
- Standards cited
- WCAG 2.1
Summary
According to the complaint, plaintiff Geovanni Bahena Figueroa, a visually-impaired individual, is suing AKWHP, LLC for failing to make its website, www.anneklein.com, accessible to blind users as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The plaintiff alleges that he encountered multiple barriers while attempting to access the website to purchase a smartwatch set, which prevented him from enjoying the same shopping experience as sighted individuals. The complaint cites specific access barriers such as missing alt-text and broken links. The plaintiff seeks a permanent injunction to require the defendant to comply with accessibility standards and to ensure that the website is usable by blind individuals.
About the defendant
Offers products and services for online sale including watches, smartwatch sets, jewelry, handbags, and accessories.
What the complaint says
The problems the plaintiff describes with the website.
- Defendant's website is not accessible to blind and visually impaired individuals.
- Plaintiff encountered barriers that denied full access to the website.
- Defendant failed to comply with WCAG 2.1 guidelines.
Legal claims
The laws the plaintiff says the defendant broke, called causes of action.
- Violations of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12182 et seq.
- Declaratory Relief
What the plaintiff asks for
What the plaintiff wants the court to order.
- Preliminary and permanent injunction to prohibit Defendant from violating the ADA.
- Injunction requiring Defendant to make its website fully compliant with the ADA.
- Declaration that Defendant’s website discriminates against the blind.
- Class certification under Fed. R. Civ. P. 23.
- Payment of nominal damages.
- Pre- and post-judgment interest.
- Award of costs and expenses of this action.
Proposed class
The group of people the plaintiff asks to represent, so the case can cover them too.
All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Defendant’s Website and as a result have been denied access to the equal enjoyment of goods and services, during the relevant statutory period.