Can we count your visit?

Our analytics service records the pages you view, so we can see which ones are useful. It saves a random ID in your browser, and we never use it for advertising. Read our privacy policy.

Frangie Espinal v. MyCajita Corporation

Filed

Case details

Standards cited
WCAG 2.0

Summary

According to the complaint, Frangie Espinal, a visually-impaired individual, is suing MyCajita Corporation for failing to make its website accessible as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Espinal alleges that the website, which offers artisan-made goods, is not usable with screen-reading software, denying her and other visually-impaired users equal access to its services. The complaint cites multiple access barriers encountered by Espinal, including broken links and lack of alternative text for images. Espinal seeks a permanent injunction to require MyCajita to improve website accessibility and compensatory damages for the alleged discrimination.

About the defendant

Operates an online retail store offering artisan-made, culturally themed boxes inspired by Mexico and other goods, including pricing, terms of service, refund and privacy policies.

What the complaint says

The problems the plaintiff describes with the website.

  • Defendant's website is not accessible to blind and visually-impaired persons.
  • Plaintiff encountered multiple access barriers while attempting to use the website.
  • Defendant has failed to comply with WCAG 2.0 guidelines.

Legal claims

The laws the plaintiff says the defendant broke, called causes of action.

  • Violations of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12181 et seq.
  • Violations of the NYSHRL
  • Violations of the NYCHRL
  • Violation of GBL § 349

What the plaintiff asks for

What the plaintiff wants the court to order.

  • Permanent injunction requiring Defendant to make its Website accessible to blind individuals.
  • Compensatory damages for violations of civil rights under New York State Human Rights Law and GBL § 349.
  • Reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs.

Proposed class

The group of people the plaintiff asks to represent, so the case can cover them too.

All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Defendant’s Website and as a result have been denied access to the equal enjoyment of goods and services offered by Defendant’s Website, during the relevant statutory period.