Can we count your visit?

Our analytics service records the pages you view, so we can see which ones are useful. It saves a random ID in your browser, and we never use it for advertising. Read our privacy policy.

Delgadillo v. Ctac Holdings LLC

Filed

Case details

Summary

On March 29, 2019, Desmond Delgadillo filed a Complaint in New York Federal court against CTAC Holdings LLC. Plaintiff Desmond Delgadillo alleges that www.li-lacchocolates.com is not accessible per the WCAG 2.0 accessibility standard(s).

About the defendant

CTAC Holdings LLC operates Li-Lac Chocolates, an artisan chocolate company in New York City.

What the complaint says

The problems the plaintiff describes with the website.

  • Plaintiff found unlabeled buttons and links prevented him from navigating the website
  • Plaintiff also found at least one cursor trap that prevented him from navigating the website
  • Plaintiff encountered multiple pages that contained insufficient navigational headings, requiring Plaintiff to expend substantial amount of time to access information
  • Plaintiff was unable to create an account because of an inaccessible signup system
  • Plaintiff was unable to make a purchase because of an inaccessible checkout system

Legal claims

The laws the plaintiff says the defendant broke, called causes of action.

  • Violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act
  • Violations of the Unruh Civil Rights Act, California Civil Code § 51 et seq.

What the plaintiff asks for

What the plaintiff wants the court to order.

  • A preliminary and permanent injunction enjoining Defendant from violating the UCRA, Civil Code § 51 et seq, with respect to its website
  • A preliminary and permanent injunction requiring Defendant to take the steps necessary to make its website readily accessible to and usable by blind and visually-impaired individuals
  • An award of statutory minimum damages of $4,000 per violation pursuant to § 52(a) of the California Civil Code
  • An additional award of $4,000.00 as deterrence damages for each violation pursuant to Johnson v. Guedoir, 218 F. Supp. 3d 1096; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 150740 (USDC Cal, E.D. 2016)
  • For attorneys' fees and expenses pursuant to all applicable laws including, without limitation, pursuant to California Civil Code § 52(a)
  • For prejudgment interest to the extent permitted by law
  • For costs of suit
  • For such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper