Can we count your visit?

Our analytics service records the pages you view, so we can see which ones are useful. It saves a random ID in your browser, and we never use it for advertising. Read our privacy policy.

Darnell Williams v. Super7 OpCo LLC

Filed

Case details

Defendant’s website
Standards cited
WCAG 2.2

Summary

According to the complaint, Darnell Williams, a visually impaired individual, is suing Super7 OpCo LLC for failing to make its website, https://super7.com, accessible to blind users. Williams alleges that the website contains numerous barriers that prevent him and others from independently navigating and completing purchases. The complaint cites violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and seeks a permanent injunction to require the defendant to make necessary changes to the website to ensure accessibility. Williams claims that the current design forces visually impaired users to rely on sighted assistance, thus denying them equal access to the goods and services offered online.

About the defendant

Provides an online platform for purchasing a variety of collectible action figures, retro-inspired toys, apparel, and pop-culture products.

What the complaint says

The problems the plaintiff describes with the website.

  • Website is inaccessible to visually impaired individuals
  • Failure to provide necessary accommodations for screen-reader users
  • Significant access barriers prevent independent navigation and transactions

Legal claims

The laws the plaintiff says the defendant broke, called causes of action.

  • Violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
  • Declaratory Relief

What the plaintiff asks for

What the plaintiff wants the court to order.

  • Permanent injunction requiring Defendant to make the Website accessible
  • Compensatory damages for Class Members
  • Certification of the case as a class action

Proposed class

The group of people the plaintiff asks to represent, so the case can cover them too.

All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access the Website and as a result have been denied access to the enjoyment of goods and services offered by the Website, during the relevant statutory period.