Can we count your visit?

Our analytics service records the pages you view, so we can see which ones are useful. It saves a random ID in your browser, and we never use it for advertising. Read our privacy policy.

Clay Lee Jones v. Kamakura Shirts New York Co., Ltd.

Filed

Case details

Summary

According to the complaint, Plaintiff CLAY LEE JONES is suing KAMAKURA SHIRTS NEW YORK CO., LTD. for failing to make their website, www.kamakurashirts.com, accessible to blind and visually impaired individuals, violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Plaintiff alleges that he encountered multiple barriers while attempting to purchase a shirt, specifically the 'New York Slim Fit - Button Down Oxford,' which prevented him from completing the transaction. The complaint cites various access issues, including missing alt-text and unclear navigation, which hinder the use of screen-reading software. Plaintiffs seek a permanent injunction to require the Defendant to comply with accessibility standards and to provide compensatory damages for the alleged discrimination.

About the defendant

Offers online sales of high-quality shirts known for Japanese craftsmanship and timeless menswear staples, including product updates and promotions.

What the complaint says

The problems the plaintiff describes with the website.

  • Defendant's website is inaccessible to blind and visually impaired individuals.
  • Plaintiff was denied the ability to purchase products due to website barriers.
  • Defendant failed to comply with WCAG 2.1 guidelines.

Legal claims

The laws the plaintiff says the defendant broke, called causes of action.

  • Violations of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12182 et seq.
  • Violations of the NYCHRL
  • Declaratory Relief

What the plaintiff asks for

What the plaintiff wants the court to order.

  • Permanent injunction requiring Defendant to make the Website accessible.
  • Compensatory damages for violations of civil rights under New York City Human Rights Law.
  • Attorney’s fees and costs.

Proposed class

The group of people the plaintiff asks to represent, so the case can cover them too.

All legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access Defendant’s Website and as a result have been denied access to the equal enjoyment of goods and services, during the relevant statutory period.