Ashley Bahena v. Caleel + Hayden, LLC
Filed
Case details
- Defendant’s website
- Standards cited
- WCAG 2.2
Summary
According to the complaint, Ashley Bahena, a visually impaired individual, is suing Caleel + Hayden, LLC for failing to make their website, Gloskinbeauty.com, accessible under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Bahena alleges that the website contains significant access barriers that prevent blind and visually impaired users from independently navigating and completing transactions. The complaint cites various specific accessibility issues, including the lack of alternative text for images and the requirement to use a mouse for transactions. Bahena seeks a permanent injunction to require the defendant to make the website accessible and compensatory damages for the discrimination faced. The case is filed as a class action on behalf of all legally blind individuals who have faced similar barriers.
About the defendant
Provides consumers access to an array of skincare and cosmetic products, including cleansers, serums, moisturizers, foundations, and treatment solutions for purchase online.
What the complaint says
The problems the plaintiff describes with the website.
- Website is inaccessible to visually impaired individuals
- Access barriers prevent independent navigation and transactions
- Defendant failed to implement necessary accessibility features
Legal claims
The laws the plaintiff says the defendant broke, called causes of action.
- Violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
What the plaintiff asks for
What the plaintiff wants the court to order.
- Preliminary and permanent injunction to prohibit violations of the ADA
- Injunction requiring compliance with ADA
- Declaration of discrimination against visually impaired individuals
- Class action certification
- Pre- and post-judgment interest
- Award of costs and attorney fees
Proposed class
The group of people the plaintiff asks to represent, so the case can cover them too.
all legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access the Website and as a result have been denied access to the enjoyment of goods and services offered by the Website, during the relevant statutory period.