Can we count your visit?

Our analytics service records the pages you view, so we can see which ones are useful. It saves a random ID in your browser, and we never use it for advertising. Read our privacy policy.

Antoinette Suchenko, Karen Clayton v. Clean Beauty Collective, Inc.

Filed

Case details

Summary

According to the complaint, plaintiffs Antoinette Suchenko and Karen Clayton, both legally blind, are suing Clean Beauty Collective, Inc. for failing to make its digital platform accessible as required by the ADA. They allege that they encountered significant barriers while attempting to access the website to purchase products, including navigation issues with screen readers and lack of descriptive labels for links. The plaintiffs seek a permanent injunction to require the defendant to implement accessibility measures and to ensure that individuals with visual disabilities can fully access the digital platform.

About the defendant

Designs, develops, manufactures, and distributes perfumes, hair care, skin care, body care, and related products.

What the complaint says

The problems the plaintiff describes with the website.

  • Defendant's digital properties are not accessible to legally blind individuals.
  • Plaintiffs encountered barriers that denied them access to the defendant's online goods and services.
  • Accessibility barriers include ineffective communication and navigation issues for screen reader users.

Legal claims

The laws the plaintiff says the defendant broke, called causes of action.

  • Title III of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12181 et seq.

What the plaintiff asks for

What the plaintiff wants the court to order.

  • Permanent injunction requiring defendant to make its digital platform accessible.
  • Retain a qualified consultant for web accessibility improvements.
  • Training for employees on web accessibility.