Can we count your visit?

Our analytics service records the pages you view, so we can see which ones are useful. It saves a random ID in your browser, and we never use it for advertising. Read our privacy policy.

Aaron See v. Parasol Co

Filed

Case details

Standards cited
WCAG 2.2

Summary

According to the complaint, Aaron See, a visually impaired individual, is suing Parasol Co for failing to make its website, https://parasolco.com, accessible to blind and visually impaired users, violating the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The complaint alleges that the website contains significant barriers that prevent users from completing transactions independently, such as lack of alternative text for images and reliance on mouse navigation. See seeks a permanent injunction to require the defendant to make the website accessible and compensatory damages for the class of visually impaired individuals who have faced similar issues.

About the defendant

Provides an array of goods and services including premium baby essentials such as disposable diapers, diaper pants, baby wipes, and disposable bibs for online purchase.

What the complaint says

The problems the plaintiff describes with the website.

  • Website is inaccessible to blind and visually impaired individuals
  • Significant access barriers prevent transactions on the Website
  • Defendant's website design relies on visual interfaces without accommodations for screen-reader users
  • Plaintiff was denied a shopping experience due to lack of accessibility features

Legal claims

The laws the plaintiff says the defendant broke, called causes of action.

  • Violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)

What the plaintiff asks for

What the plaintiff wants the court to order.

  • Permanent injunction to make the Website accessible
  • Compensatory damages for Class Members
  • Certification of the case as a class action
  • Pre- and post-judgment interest
  • Award of costs and expenses including attorney fees

Proposed class

The group of people the plaintiff asks to represent, so the case can cover them too.

all legally blind individuals in the United States who have attempted to access the Website and as a result have been denied access to the enjoyment of goods and services offered by the Website, during the relevant statutory period.